The vote to remove Minnesota Representative Ilhan Omar from Congress is finished....
Washington, D.C. - June 8, 2026
Rep. Randy Fine Signals Potential Expulsion Vote for Rep. Ilhan Omar and Introduces Dual Loyalty Legislation
Rep. Randy Fine, R-Fla., has indicated that a vote to expel Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., from Congress could move forward depending on the results of ongoing inquiries into allegations concerning her past. Fine specifically referenced expectations around information related to what he described as the “brother marriage thing.”
“We’re waiting to get the data on the brother marriage thing, which I think is coming,” Fine said during an interview. “If it turns out that that is actually the reality, will there be a vote on the floor to expel this woman from Congress? Absolutely.”
At the same time, Fine has introduced the “Disqualifying Dual Loyalty Act,” legislation that would require members of the House and Senate to hold allegiance solely to the United States. The proposal would mandate that lawmakers relinquish any foreign citizenship to remain in office.
Purpose of the Proposed Legislation
Fine framed the measure as necessary to ensure elected officials serve American interests without divided loyalties.
“The bottom line is that you can’t serve two masters,” Fine said. “If you’re going to serve in the United States Congress, you should serve America ONLY.”
Rep. Andy Harris, R-Md., expressed support for the broader effort, emphasizing national security implications beyond voting decisions.
“It’s not just about the vote,” Harris said. “It’s about access to our national security secrets. They get to learn things that people from their home countries would never get to know.”
Harris also noted the number of lawmakers born outside the United States and raised questions about whether all prior allegiances have been formally renounced. He and Fine cited Omar and at least one state-level lawmaker as examples of officials they believe may prioritize foreign interests over U.S. interests, though specific evidence for broader claims was not detailed in their public statements.
Expulsion Process and Legislative Challenges
Any expulsion vote in the House would require a two-thirds majority, a high threshold that is rarely met. No formal expulsion proceedings have been scheduled, and it remains unclear whether sufficient support exists to advance the measure.
The “Disqualifying Dual Loyalty Act” would apply to both chambers of Congress. However, it faces significant obstacles in the Senate, where Democrats hold control and have shown little interest in advancing similar proposals.
“The Senate will never, ever pass it,” Harris said. “But we want to get it done […] it’s about Americans first.”
Broader Political Context
Fine described the legislation as part of a longer-term effort to reshape standards for holding federal office. He stated that the goal is to “weed out” individuals with divided loyalties and reinforce public trust in Congress.
The renewed focus on Omar, combined with the introduction of the dual loyalty measure, has intensified debate over issues of eligibility, loyalty, and national security within Congress. Supporters argue that dual citizenship creates potential conflicts, particularly for lawmakers with access to classified information. Critics of the effort maintain that existing constitutional requirements and ethical standards are sufficient.
The situation continues to develop as lawmakers consider both the specific allegations involving Omar and the wider implications of the proposed legislation.
My Future Mother-in-Law Destroyed My Dead Mother’s Wedding Dress—Then One Whisper at the Altar Exposed Why She Needed Me to Run
Three hours before the wedding, my future mother-in-law ruined my wedding dress and left a note with just four words: "Know your place." She thought I would cry, run away, and become a laughingstock in front of 200 guests. But what silenced the entire wedding wasn't the soiled dress... it was what I whispered to the groom as we stood at the altar.
Three hours before my wedding, I found my dress floating in a bathtub full of red wine, black coffee, and something that smelled like bleach. Pinned to the ruined lace was a cream card in my future mother-in-law’s handwriting: Know your place.
For ten seconds, I couldn’t breathe.
The dress had belonged to my mother. She had worn it in 1989, and before she died, she spent six months restoring it with me—replacing pearls, repairing the train, sewing one tiny blue thread beneath the hem because she said every bride deserved one secret no one else could see.
Now the silk was pink-brown, the lace eaten through, and one sleeve had dissolved into threads.
Behind me, my maid of honor, Tessa, whispered, “Oh my God, Claire.”
I didn’t cry.
That was the first thing Evelyn Harrow got wrong.
The second was believing I didn’t know exactly why she hated me.
To Evelyn, I was “the scholarship girl” who had somehow trapped her only son, Adrian. She introduced me as “an accountant” with the same tone people used for dental plaque. At engagement dinners, she corrected my pronunciation of French wines I had never ordered and once asked whether my family “understood formal cutlery.”
She never mentioned that I was a forensic accountant specializing in family-owned companies, or that I had spent the last six months quietly helping Adrian review irregularities inside Harrow Hospitality after his father’s stroke.
Evelyn thought money made her untouchable.
She also thought Adrian knew nothing.
Tessa picked up the note with shaking fingers. “Call him. Cancel everything.”
“No.”
“Claire, she destroyed your mother’s dress.”
“I know.”
My voice sounded strangely calm.
I photographed the bathtub, the note, the hallway, the broken lock on the bridal suite, and the tiny security sensor above the service door. Then I called hotel security.
The manager arrived pale-faced.
“Mrs. Harrow requested that camera be disabled this morning,” he admitted.
Of course she had.
But Evelyn didn’t know I had installed my own battery-powered camera in the dress case after someone searched my apartment two weeks earlier.
I opened the app.
There she was.
Evelyn entered at 9:14 a.m., locked the door, poured three bottles over the gown, smiled at the camera she thought was d:ead, and placed the note on top.
Then she made a phone call.
“Once she runs,” Evelyn said, laughing, “Adrian will finally sign the amended trust papers.”
I froze the video.
Tessa stared at me. “What amended trust papers?”
I looked toward the chapel doors, where two hundred guests were waiting to watch me become a Harrow.
For the first time that morning, I almost smiled.
“The reason this wedding was never just about me.”...
To be continued in C0mments 👇
